TPTrey Pace Product systems case study
PDF ↓

01 ValueCore

From bespoke customer work to a more scalable product system.

I connected customer-facing value stories, Google Sheets data, reusable authoring tools, and an AI-assisted design practice—turning repeated delivery needs into product infrastructure.

RolePrincipal Product Designer / Design Lead
ScopeProduct UX · Systems · Customer solutions · Brand
PartnersCEO · Product · Engineering · Customer Success
Verizon Connect collision-cost customer experience
Customer evidenceVerizon value story
New GS UI chart variable editor
Product responseGS UI v2 authoring system
Follow the evidence ↓
02

The central problem

The visible requests were varied.
The underlying problem was coherence.

Situation

Customer experiences, Google Sheets tools, product interfaces, marketing, and sales communication had evolved across different needs and timelines.

Responsibility

I led hands-on UX and visual design across those surfaces while supporting a small team and partnering daily with leadership and engineering.

Shift

Customer work revealed reusable patterns. I translated them into a second-generation GS UI authoring model and a broader shared design foundation.

Own Direct ownership
Use Actively used tools
Adopt Engineer adoption
Release Near-release GS UI v2
03

Designed directly by me

The customer outcomes were becoming more sophisticated.

These were not template exercises. Each experience combined brand, financial logic, interaction, and explanation for a different customer context.

Evidence statusDirectly designed customer experiences

01 · AuditBoard

Total Benefits

Multi-year benefit tables, expandable value categories, detailed charts, and proportional value-driver summaries.

02 · Verizon Connect

Pricing + ROI

Products, terms, promotions, operational assumptions, and ROI brought into one decision surface.

03 · Flexera

Software-spend savings

Headline value, proportional visualization, multi-year comparison, and detailed financial modeling.

Better customer output was exposing the limits of the system producing it.
04

What I saw

The problem wasn’t a lack of features. It was the relationship among them.

The existing tools were capable, but administrators had to understand too much of the product’s internal structure. Content, data, configuration, and presentation competed inside the same environment.

  • 01Many configuration concerns visible simultaneously
  • 02Long spreadsheet-like authoring canvas
  • 03Internal structure drove the navigation model
  • 04Limited view of the finished customer experience
Legacy GS UI authoring experience
Original authoring environmentCapable system. Heavy cognitive load.
05

The product opportunity

Beneath the bespoke work, the same primitives kept appearing.

Customer experiencesAuditBoard · Verizon · Flexera
↓
Repeated needsTables · calculations · charts · imagery · navigation
↓
Shared behaviorsSelect · configure · preview · save · share · download
↓
Product opportunityA reusable authoring system connected to Google Sheets

The customer work stopped being only output. It became research for the platform that needed to produce the next generation of output.

06

One engine · three clear layers

Keep Google Sheets as the engine.
Redesign everything around it.

01

Source data

Inputs, outputs, ranges, and variables

feeds
02

Experience configuration

Tables, charts, imagery, labels, layout, and interactions

shapes
03

Customer presentation

Branded value stories, financial results, and downloadable output

07

The redesigned workflow

Evidence statusNear-release GS UI v2 product direction

Step 01

Select the source.

Administrators identify the relevant data directly—without recreating its structure elsewhere.

  • Visual range selection
  • Workbook-tab navigation
  • Explicit creation action
Step 02

Shape the experience.

Edit one meaningful object at a time while seeing where it lives and how the customer will experience it.

  • Focused object controls
  • Persistent live context
  • Clear source-range access
Step 03

Turn data into
explanation.

A staged editor converts an implementation problem into an understandable design task.

  • Graph-type selection
  • Variable and label mapping
  • Live chart preview
08

Shared decisions, not isolated screens

The redesign was supported by a foundation that could travel.

I built the ValueCore design system to preserve decisions across product, marketing, presentations, engineering, and AI-assisted workflows—not simply to catalog components.

Adopted acrossLead Harvesters
Adopted acrossPitch decks + presentations
Adopted acrossGoogle Sheets UI
Reusable byDesigners · engineers · AI
09

AI + accountable judgment

AI increased the range. Experience determined what survived.

The first generated direction for KeyMark’s ROI calculator missed the brand, layout, and important parts of the feature set. I redirected all three.

01

Brand fit

Replaced generic calculator styling with a design native to KeyMark’s visual language.

02

Interaction path

Created a single readable journey from operational inputs to a complex three-year result.

03

Feature integrity

Restored ROI composition, payback, hours saved, and the custom-report action required for a credible decision.

Delivered, implementation-ready designInteractive prototype

ValueCore delivered the redesign for customer implementation. It had not been publicly deployed by KeyMark as of September 2026.

AI accelerated

Synthesis · interface exploration · interactive production · alternative structures

I remained responsible for

Product interpretation · UX architecture · hierarchy · brand accuracy · complexity reduction · final quality

10

Evidence, not inflation

A clearer workflow with infrastructure built for the next customer.

  • Customer and internal tools were actively used
  • Shared grids, type, components, and patterns were adopted by engineers
  • More capability with less learning burden
  • GS UI v2 was approaching release when my role ended
  • Customer response to the Verizon work was strongly positive
My operating principle

AI expanded the number of possibilities I could explore. Experience determined which possibilities deserved to survive.

Expanded project evidence